A place where users can report and comment on usage of the APEWS.ORG blocklist as an antispam measure on email servers. In particular the focus is to publish errors, known as false positives, in response to the decline in usefulness of Usenet where formerly there were "sightings" and "blocklists" newsgroups.
June 20, 2013
L2.APEWS.ORG False Positive #20
Wed 2013-06-19 04:27:06: [4181:459] Accepting SMTP connection from [203.191.244.137]
Wed 2013-06-19 04:27:06: [4181:459] Looking up PTR record for 203.191.244.137 (137.244.191.203.IN-ADDR.ARPA)
Wed 2013-06-19 04:27:06: [4181:459] D=137.128-26.244.191.203.IN-ADDR.ARPA TTL=(59) PTR=[mail3-5.webcas.net]
Wed 2013-06-19 04:27:06: [4181:459] Gathering A-records for PTR hosts
Wed 2013-06-19 04:27:06: [4181:459] D=mail3-5.webcas.net TTL=(60) A=[203.191.244.137]
Wed 2013-06-19 04:27:06: [4181:459] --> 220-ns7.methusalah.com ESMTP MDaemon 6.7.9; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:27:06 -0500
Wed 2013-06-19 04:27:06: [4181:459] -->
Wed 2013-06-19 04:27:07: [4181:459] <-- EHLO wcasp3-efmta2.webcas.net
Wed 2013-06-19 04:27:07: [4181:459] Performing reverse lookup on wcasp3-efmta2.webcas.net (looking for 203.191.244.137)
Wed 2013-06-19 04:27:07: [4181:459] Name server reports domain name unknown.
Wed 2013-06-19 04:27:07: [4181:459] --> 250-ns7.methusalah.com Hello mail3-5.webcas.net (may be forged), pleased to meet you
Wed 2013-06-19 04:27:07: [4181:459] --> 250-ETRN
Wed 2013-06-19 04:27:07: [4181:459] --> 250-AUTH=LOGIN
Wed 2013-06-19 04:27:07: [4181:459] --> 250-AUTH LOGIN CRAM-MD5
Wed 2013-06-19 04:27:07: [4181:459] --> 250-8BITMIME
Wed 2013-06-19 04:27:07: [4181:459] --> 250 SIZE 0
Wed 2013-06-19 04:27:07: [4181:459] <-- MAIL FROM:<errmailxxx @ mail3.webcas.net> SIZE=11707
Wed 2013-06-19 04:27:07: [4181:459] Performing reverse lookup on mail3.webcas.net (looking for 203.191.244.137)
Wed 2013-06-19 04:27:07: [4181:459] D=mail3.webcas.net TTL=(60) A=[203.191.244.132]
Wed 2013-06-19 04:27:08: [4181:459] P=010 D=mail3.webcas.net TTL=(60) MX=[mail3.webcas.net] {203.191.244.132}
Wed 2013-06-19 04:27:08: [4181:459] Spam Blocker A-record resolution of [137.244.191.203.L2.APEWS.ORG] in progress (DNS Server: 192.168.1.3)...
Wed 2013-06-19 04:27:08: [4181:459] L2.APEWS.ORG LISTED
Wed 2013-06-19 04:27:08: [4181:459] Message will be accepted and X-RBL-Warning: header will be inserted.
Wed 2013-06-19 04:27:08: [4181:459] --> 250 <errmailxxx @ mail3.webcas.net>, Sender ok
Wed 2013-06-19 04:27:08: [4181:459] <-- RCPT TO:<xxx@xxx.xxx>
Wed 2013-06-19 04:27:08: [4181:459] --> 250 <xxx@xxx.xxx>, Recipient ok
Wed 2013-06-19 04:27:08: [4181:459] <-- DATA
Wed 2013-06-19 04:27:08: [4181:459] --> 354 Enter mail, end with <CRLF>.<CRLF>
Wed 2013-06-19 04:27:09: [4181:459] --> 250 Ok, message saved <Message-ID: xxx.newsletter @ japantravelinfo.com>
Wed 2013-06-19 04:27:09: [4181:459] <-- QUIT
Wed 2013-06-19 04:27:09: [4181:459] --> 221 See ya in cyberspace
Wed 2013-06-19 04:27:09: [4181:459] SMTP session successful, 11682 bytes transferred.
Wed 2013-06-19 04:27:09: [4181:459] Shuffling message(s) into proper queue(s)
Wed 2013-06-19 04:27:09: [4181:459] Message received from wcasp3-efmta2.webcas.net [203.191.244.137] <errmail4-03@mail3.webcas.net> with SMTP for <xxx@xxx.xxx> [Size 11671] {j:\localq\7000002893.msg}
June 18, 2013
Apews listing only part of the problem, correctly listed IP
Thanks!
Full headers:
Received: from pusen02 (192.168.16.40) by connect.activedata.ca
(192.168.16.38) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.247.3; Tue, 18 Jun
2013 07:59:31 -0400
Received: from pusen02 ([162.39.36.66] helo=pusen02) by ASSP.nospam with SMTP
(2.3.3); 18 Jun 2013 07:59:31 -0400
From: <***@***.com>
Subject: [SPAM]
To: J*** <***@***.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 07:49:24 -0400
Message-ID: <201306180749242N.DCSML-S000250000.000074FBD545@172.23.40.3>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="_41dffd17-33c1-4156-825e-2450e53d5501_"
X-Assp-Version: 2.3.3(13137) on ASSP.nospam
X-Assp-ID: ASSP.nospam m1-56771-09551
X-Assp-Session: 7F329949E7B8 (mail 1)
X-Assp-Server-TLS: yes
X-Assp-Received-SPF: softfail ip=162.39.36.66 mailfrom=***@***.com
helo=pusen02
X-Original-Authentication-Results: ASSP.nospam; spf=softfail
X-Assp-Message-Score: 5 (SPF softfail)
X-Assp-IP-Score: 5 (SPF softfail)
X-Assp-Message-Score: 35 (DNSBLcache: neutral, 162.39.36.66 listed in
l2.apews.org{127.0.0.2})
X-Assp-IP-Score: 35 (DNSBLcache: neutral, 162.39.36.66 listed in
l2.apews.org{127.0.0.2})
X-Assp-DNSBLcache: neutral, 162.39.36.66 listed in l2.apews.org{127.0.0.2}
X-Assp-Message-Score: 10 (invalid HELO: 'pusen02')
X-Assp-IP-Score: 10 (invalid HELO: 'pusen02')
X-Assp-Bayes-Confidence: 0.00040
X-Assp-Tag: MessageLimit
X-Assp-Spam: YES
X-Spam-Status: yes
X-Assp-Spam-Reason: MessageScore passed low limit
X-Assp-Message-Totalscore: 50
X-Assp-Spam-Level: ***********
Return-Path: ***@***.com
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: ExchSrv.activedata.local
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous
The delivering server is using an incorrect HELO/EHLO, it should be a FQDN (fully qualified domain name) and to do that you need to contact your ISP, Windstream, and tell them what FQDN you want them to write in their DNS server for a PTR record. Windstream are using generic PTR records which are not satisfactory for email servers, yours is showing as;
h66.36.39.162.static.ip.windstream.net
That alone will cause your emails to fail reverse DNS lookups that many email servers perform automatically in realtime.
Using Windstream IP space probably isn't doing you any favors either. If they won't do that DNS entry for you, you'll have to change ISP or accept a poor delivery rate.
The person that did the setup of your email server does not know enough to do the job, we suggest you contact a professional who should know about things like EHLO/HELO configuration and SMTP per RFCs.
No evidence of Apews listing causing this email delivery failure
Thu 2013-01-31 17:19:22: * Connection established (192.168.0.115:3302 -> 198.80.42.2:25)
Thu 2013-01-31 17:19:22: Waiting for protocol to start...
Thu 2013-01-31 17:19:22: <-- 220 portal1.visa.com - Access is monitored. SMTP Proxy Server Ready
Thu 2013-01-31 17:19:22: --> EHLO mail.ticketworld.com.ph
Thu 2013-01-31 17:19:22: <-- 250-ESMTP Server Ready
Thu 2013-01-31 17:19:22: <-- 250-SIZE 20971520
Thu 2013-01-31 17:19:22: <-- 250-DSN
Thu 2013-01-31 17:19:22: <-- 250-STARTTLS
Thu 2013-01-31 17:19:22: <-- 250 TLS
Thu 2013-01-31 17:19:22: --> MAIL From: SIZE=51304
Thu 2013-01-31 17:19:23: <-- 250 +OK Sender OK
Thu 2013-01-31 17:19:23: --> RCPT To:
Thu 2013-01-31 17:19:23: <-- 250 +OK Recipient OK
Thu 2013-01-31 17:19:23: --> DATA
Thu 2013-01-31 17:19:23: <-- 354 Start mail input, end with '.'
Thu 2013-01-31 17:19:23: Sending to [198.80.42.2]
Thu 2013-01-31 17:19:24: Transfer Complete
Thu 2013-01-31 17:19:25: <-- 554 Transaction Failed Spam Message not queued.
This looks like your connection to the server was authenticated correctly and that the email delivered correctly too. It seems to have failed on possibly content of the email or other parameters that were tested for during/after receipt of the email. I suggest that you contact the server administrator. There is no mention of a failure due to an Apews.org listing.
February 6, 2013
L2.APEWS.ORG False Positive #19
Wed 2013-02-06 04:24:19: [710:3560] Accepting SMTP connection from [208.73.5.67]
Wed 2013-02-06 04:24:19: [710:3560] Looking up PTR record for 208.73.5.67 (67.5.73.208.IN-ADDR.ARPA)
Wed 2013-02-06 04:24:20: [710:3560] D=67.5.73.208.IN-ADDR.ARPA TTL=(59) PTR=[mail4598.outdoorhub.mkt5196.com]
Wed 2013-02-06 04:24:20: [710:3560] Gathering A-records for PTR hosts
Wed 2013-02-06 04:24:20: [710:3560] D=mail4598.outdoorhub.mkt5196.com TTL=(60) A=[208.73.5.67]
Wed 2013-02-06 04:24:20: [710:3560] --> 220 xxx.xxx.xxx ESMTP MDaemon; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 04:24:20
Wed 2013-02-06 04:24:20: [710:3560] <-- EHLO mail4598.outdoorhub.mkt5196.com
Wed 2013-02-06 04:24:20: [710:3560] Performing reverse lookup on mail4598.outdoorhub.mkt5196.com (looking for 208.73.5.67)
Wed 2013-02-06 04:24:20: [710:3560] D=mail4598.outdoorhub.mkt5196.com TTL=(60) A=[208.73.5.67]
Wed 2013-02-06 04:24:20: [710:3560] --> 250-xxx.xxx.xxx Hello mail4598.outdoorhub.mkt5196.com, pleased to meet you
Wed 2013-02-06 04:24:20: [710:3560] --> 250-ETRN
Wed 2013-02-06 04:24:20: [710:3560] --> 250-AUTH=LOGIN
Wed 2013-02-06 04:24:20: [710:3560] --> 250-AUTH LOGIN CRAM-MD5
Wed 2013-02-06 04:24:20: [710:3560] --> 250-8BITMIME
Wed 2013-02-06 04:24:20: [710:3560] --> 250 SIZE 0
Wed 2013-02-06 04:24:21: [710:3560] <-- MAIL FROM:<xxx @ bounce.outdoorhub.mkt5196.com> BODY=8BITMIME
Wed 2013-02-06 04:24:21: [710:3560] Performing reverse lookup on bounce.outdoorhub.mkt5196.com (looking for 208.73.5.67)
Wed 2013-02-06 04:24:21: [710:3560] D=bounce.outdoorhub.mkt5196.com TTL=(60) A=[74.121.50.42]
Wed 2013-02-06 04:24:21: [710:3560] P=005 D=bounce.outdoorhub.mkt5196.com TTL=(60) MX=[bounce.outdoorhub.mkt5196.com] {74.121.50.42}
Wed 2013-02-06 04:24:21: [710:3560] Spam Blocker A-record resolution of [67.5.73.208.L2.APEWS.ORG] in progress (DNS Server: 192.168.1.2)...
Wed 2013-02-06 04:24:21: [710:3560] Spam Blocker D=67.5.73.208.L2.APEWS.ORG TTL=(35) A=[127.0.0.2]
Wed 2013-02-06 04:24:21: [710:3560] L2.APEWS.ORG LISTED
Wed 2013-02-06 04:24:21: [710:3560] Message will be accepted and X-RBL-Warning: header will be inserted.
Wed 2013-02-06 04:24:21: [710:3560] --> 250 <xxx @ bounce.outdoorhub.mkt5196.com>, Sender ok
Wed 2013-02-06 04:24:21: [710:3560] <-- RCPT TO:<xxx @ xxx.xxx>
Wed 2013-02-06 04:24:21: [710:3560] --> 250 <xxx @ xxx.xxx>, Recipient ok
Wed 2013-02-06 04:24:21: [710:3560] <-- DATA
Wed 2013-02-06 04:24:21: [710:3560] --> 354 Enter mail, end with <CRLF>.<CRLF>
Wed 2013-02-06 04:24:22: [710:3560] --> 250 Ok, message saved <Message-ID: 00000000000000000.JavaMail.app @ xxxx.xxx>
Wed 2013-02-06 04:24:22: [710:3560] <-- QUIT
Wed 2013-02-06 04:24:22: [710:3560] --> 221 See ya in cyberspace
Wed 2013-02-06 04:24:22: [710:3560] SMTP session successful, 36340 bytes transferred.
Wed 2013-02-06 04:24:22: [710:3560] Shuffling message(s) into proper queue(s)
Wed 2013-02-06 04:24:22: [710:3560] Message received from mail4598.outdoorhub.mkt5196.com [208.73.5.67] <xxx @ bounce.outdoorhub.mkt5196.com> with SMTP for <xxx @ xxx.xxx> [Size 36326] {j:\mdaemon\localq\md0000000.msg}
December 13, 2012
L2.APEWS.ORG False Positive #18
Thu 2012-12-13 03:14:01: [7552:543] Accepting SMTP connection from [89.31.209.89]
Thu 2012-12-13 03:14:01: [7552:543] --> 220 xxx.xxx.xxx ESMTP MDaemon 6.7.9; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 03:14:01 -0100
Thu 2012-12-13 03:14:01: [7552:543] <-- HELO newsletter.gan.co.za
Thu 2012-12-13 03:14:01: [7552:543] --> 250 xxx.xxx.xxx Hello newsletter.gan.co.za, pleased to meet you
Thu 2012-12-13 03:14:01: [7552:543] <-- MAIL FROM:<bounce-00000000-00000000@ newsletter.gan.co.za>
Thu 2012-12-13 03:14:01: [7552:543] Spam Blocker A-record resolution of [89.209.31.89.L2.APEWS.ORG] in progress (DNS Server: 192.168.1.2)...
Thu 2012-12-13 03:14:01: [7552:543] Spam Blocker D=89.209.31.89.L2.APEWS.ORG TTL=(35) A=[127.0.0.2]
Thu 2012-12-13 03:14:01: [7552:543] L2.APEWS.ORG LISTED
Thu 2012-12-13 03:14:01: [7552:543] Message will be accepted and X-RBL-Warning: header will be inserted.
Thu 2012-12-13 03:14:01: [7552:543] --> 250 <bounce-00000000-00000000@ newsletter.gan.co.za>, Sender ok
Thu 2012-12-13 03:14:01: [7552:543] <-- RCPT TO:<xxx@ xxx.xxx>
Thu 2012-12-13 03:14:01: [7552:543] --> 250 <xxx@ xxx.xxx>, Recipient ok
Thu 2012-12-13 03:14:02: [7552:543] <-- DATA
Thu 2012-12-13 03:14:02: [7552:543] --> 354 Enter mail, end with <CRLF>.<CRLF>
Thu 2012-12-13 03:14:03: [7552:543] --> 250 Ok, message saved <Message-ID: SUPPORT-00000000-00000000-2012.12.13-00.00.00--xxx#xxx.xxx@ newsletter.gan.co.za>
Thu 2012-12-13 03:14:03: [7552:543] <-- RSET
Thu 2012-12-13 03:14:03: [7552:543] Shuffling message(s) into proper queue(s)
Thu 2012-12-13 03:14:03: [7552:543] Message received from newsletter.gan.co.za [89.31.209.89] <bounce-00000000-00000000@ newsletter.gan.co.za> with SMTP for <xxx@ xxx.xxx> [Size 55311] {j:\localq\0000231504.msg}
Thu 2012-12-13 03:14:03: [7552:543] SMTP session successful, 55322 bytes transferred.
Thu 2012-12-13 03:14:03: [7552:543] --> 250 RSET? Well, ok.
Thu 2012-12-13 03:14:08: [7552:543] <-- QUIT
Thu 2012-12-13 03:14:08: [7552:543] --> 221 See ya in cyberspace
Thu 2012-12-13 03:14:08: [7552:543] SMTP session successful, 55328 bytes transferred.
September 28, 2012
L2.APEWS.ORG False Positive #17
Wed 2012-09-26 11:55:27: [180:366] Accepting SMTP connection from [67.222.55.9]
Wed 2012-09-26 11:55:27: [180:366] Looking up PTR record for 67.222.55.9 (9.55.222.67.IN-ADDR.ARPA)
Wed 2012-09-26 11:55:28: [180:366] D=9.55.222.67.IN-ADDR.ARPA TTL=(1440) PTR=[oproxy7-pub.bluehost.com]
Wed 2012-09-26 11:55:28: [180:366] Gathering A-records for PTR hosts
Wed 2012-09-26 11:55:29: [180:366] D=oproxy7-pub.bluehost.com TTL=(240) A=[67.222.55.9]
Wed 2012-09-26 11:55:29: [180:366] --> 220 xxx.xxx.xxx ESMTP ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 11:55:27 -0100
Wed 2012-09-26 11:55:29: [180:366] <-- HELO oproxy7-pub.bluehost.com
Wed 2012-09-26 11:55:29: [180:366] Performing reverse lookup on oproxy7-pub.bluehost.com (looking for 67.222.55.9)
Wed 2012-09-26 11:55:29: [180:366] D=oproxy7-pub.bluehost.com TTL=(239) A=[67.222.55.9]
Wed 2012-09-26 11:55:29: [180:366] --> 250 xxx.xxx.xxx Hello oproxy7-pub.bluehost.com, pleased to meet you
Wed 2012-09-26 11:55:29: [180:366] <-- MAIL FROM:<xxx@ box731.bluehost.com>
Wed 2012-09-26 11:55:29: [180:366] Performing reverse lookup on box731.bluehost.com (looking for 67.222.55.9)
Wed 2012-09-26 11:55:29: [180:366] D=box731.bluehost.com TTL=(240) A=[66.147.244.231]
Wed 2012-09-26 11:55:29: [180:366] Spam Blocker A-record resolution of [9.55.222.67.L2.APEWS.ORG] in progress...
Wed 2012-09-26 11:55:29: [180:366] Spam Blocker D=9.55.222.67.L2.APEWS.ORG TTL=(35) A=[127.0.0.2]
Wed 2012-09-26 11:55:29: [180:366] L2.APEWS.ORG LISTED
Wed 2012-09-26 11:55:29: [180:366] --> 250 <xxx@ box731.bluehost.com>, Sender ok
Wed 2012-09-26 11:55:29: [180:366] <-- RCPT TO:<xxx@ xxx.xxx>
Wed 2012-09-26 11:55:29: [180:366] 'Recipient unknown' given to divert future spam
Wed 2012-09-26 11:55:29: [180:366] --> 550 <xxx@ xxx.xxx>, Recipient unknown
Wed 2012-09-26 11:55:29: [180:366] <-- QUIT
Wed 2012-09-26 11:55:29: [180:366] --> 221 See ya in cyberspace
Wed 2012-09-26 11:55:29: [180:366] SMTP session successful, 124 bytes transferred.
Note for other posters here, we operate email servers that receive emails for our users, one has complained to us about this false positive, we are publishing it.
September 20, 2012
Still no False Positives
Anyone wanting a removal would do better to publish the email header from a receiver as we have done.
These days it's all about reputation and permission, even new allocations to existing ISPs that have a bad rep can expect to remain listed. Folks have had enough of snowshoe spamming out of newly acquired IP blocks.
IPv4 address space is nearly all allocated and most of it has been assessed by the apews.org team to great effect. Consistently trapping 95% or more of spam sent with less then 0.5% false positives is a great statistic so there can't be much wrong with the apews.org data. We encourage email receivers to publish errors here, prove the error with the full email headers, munge them for privacy if you want to. That way there is a public record of the error in your view, shame apews.org into fixing that error.
We can see that soon there will be no more IPv4 addresses for spammers to pollute, old existing allocations will have to be cleaned up in order to regain a good rep or stay listed. No residential IP address space needs to send email so outbound connections to port TCP 25 should be disallowed at the ISP firewall and it's so easy to do.
Right now there needs to be a 2 tier tariff for IP addresses, the price for apews.org listed IP address space should be dirt cheap to rent or even free since there is ad revenue from the http traffic. That is the usual business model, give free access with commercials which cover the costs incurred. ISPs are running all their user traffic through http proxy servers for ad tracking etc, try blocking their http server addresses at your firewall and you will lose your internet connection.
Clean IP address space that never gets listed by blacklists is obviously run professionally and volume email senders do so with the permission of the recipient. Their IP address space should command a premium in value and they deserve to earn more out of their email sending services e.g. providing smart hosts for clients. They won't take dirty email databases though :-) If you're really serious about inboxing then pay for a service from one of these guys.
Nice to see more email servers using the l2.apews.org for blocking as published on NANAE usenet newsgroup recently. Spam is no longer problem. We've had a lot of extra spare time for server maintenance and monitoring the whitelists, user complaints have stopped and the techs are up to date. In our server logs we've seen subscriptions to newsletter being honored, not bounced by using the apews dataset, what more can I say. Once we see the subscription process followed by an acceptance email we whitelist that enews server.
June 14, 2012
Some analysis of Apews data
Single IP addresses that have made a direct connection to our servers in order to send spam email have also been found in C-1, C-2, C-12, C-35C-52, C-53, C-66, C-67, C-73 and C-630.
Mostly /24 listings can mostly be found in C-3, C-11, C-13, C-21, C-36, C-41, C-130, C-1375 and C-1402. These /24 generally include the above single IP addresses suggesting that they are maybe escalations.
Single IP addresses that have done port scanning, SSH probes, attempted PHP or SQL injection, password guessing, hosting landing pages that contain virus, trojan etc have only been found in C-16 and C-86.
CIDR that contain residential customers, typically have no reverse DNS and generic host names (as noted in some records by Apews) have been found in C-22, C-1010 and C-1403. These are often referred to as dynamic since they can be large DHCP pools too. These CIDR would not be RFC compliant for the sending of emails.
Other CIDR, usually larger than /24, can be found in C-14, C-15, C-17, C-18, C-20, C-79, C-258 and C-813.
June 7, 2012
L2.APEWS.ORG False Positive #16
Wed 2012-06-06 08:55:21: [140:457] Accepting SMTP connection from [109.123.106.210]
Wed 2012-06-06 08:55:21: [140:457] Looking up PTR record for 109.123.106.210 (210.106.123.109.IN-ADDR.ARPA)
Wed 2012-06-06 08:55:21: [140:457] D=210.106.123.109.IN-ADDR.ARPA TTL=(1439) PTR=[srv-eight.clevercherry.net]
Wed 2012-06-06 08:55:21: [140:457] Gathering A-records for PTR hosts
Wed 2012-06-06 08:55:21: [140:457] D=srv-eight.clevercherry.net TTL=(240) A=[109.123.106.210]
Wed 2012-06-06 08:55:21: [140:457] --> 220 xxx.xxx.xxx ESMTP MDaemon 6.7.9; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 08:55:21 -0100
Wed 2012-06-06 08:55:21: [140:457] <-- EHLO srv-eight.clevercherry.net
Wed 2012-06-06 08:55:21: [140:457] Performing reverse lookup on srv-eight.clevercherry.net (looking for 109.123.106.210)
Wed 2012-06-06 08:55:21: [140:457] D=srv-eight.clevercherry.net TTL=(240) A=[109.123.106.210]
Wed 2012-06-06 08:55:21: [140:457] --> 250-xxx.xxx.xxx Hello srv-eight.clevercherry.net, pleased to meet you
Wed 2012-06-06 08:55:21: [140:457] --> 250-ETRN
Wed 2012-06-06 08:55:21: [140:457] --> 250-AUTH=LOGIN
Wed 2012-06-06 08:55:21: [140:457] --> 250-AUTH LOGIN CRAM-MD5
Wed 2012-06-06 08:55:21: [140:457] --> 250-8BITMIME
Wed 2012-06-06 08:55:21: [140:457] --> 250 SIZE 0
Wed 2012-06-06 08:55:21: [140:457] <-- MAIL FROM:<xxx @ xxx.xxx> SIZE=16289
Wed 2012-06-06 08:55:21: [140:457] Performing reverse lookup on xxx.clevercherry.com (looking for 109.123.106.210)
Wed 2012-06-06 08:55:21: [140:457] D=xxx.clevercherry.com TTL=(240) A=[109.123.106.210]
Wed 2012-06-06 08:55:21: [140:457] Spam Blocker A-record resolution of [210.106.123.109.L2.APEWS.ORG] in progress (DNS Server: 192.168.1.2)...
Wed 2012-06-06 08:55:21: [140:457] Spam Blocker D=210.106.123.109.L2.APEWS.ORG TTL=(35) A=[127.0.0.2]
Wed 2012-06-06 08:55:21: [140:457] L2.APEWS.ORG LISTED
Wed 2012-06-06 08:55:21: [140:457] Message will be accepted and X-RBL-Warning: header will be inserted.
Wed 2012-06-06 08:55:21: [140:457] --> 250 <xxx @ xxx.xxx>, Sender ok
Wed 2012-06-06 08:55:21: [140:457] <-- RCPT TO:<xxx @ xxx.xxx>
Wed 2012-06-06 08:55:21: [140:457] --> 250 <xxx @ xxx.xxx>, Recipient ok
Wed 2012-06-06 08:55:21: [140:457] <-- DATA
Wed 2012-06-06 08:55:21: [140:457] --> 354 Enter mail, end with <CRLF>.<CRLF>
Wed 2012-06-06 08:55:21: [140:457] --> 250 Ok, message saved <Message-ID: E1ScCvc-0005YX-27@srv-eight.clevercherry.net>
Wed 2012-06-06 08:55:21: [140:457] <-- QUIT
Wed 2012-06-06 08:55:21: [140:457] --> 221 See ya in cyberspace
Wed 2012-06-06 08:55:21: [140:457] SMTP session successful, 15603 bytes transferred.
Wed 2012-06-06 08:55:21: [140:457] Shuffling message(s) into proper queue(s)
Wed 2012-06-06 08:55:21: [140:457] Message received from srv-eight.clevercherry.net [109.123.106.210] <xxx @ xxx.xxx> with SMTP for <xxx @ xxx.xxx> [Size 10502] {j:\localq\6443522.msg}
May 16, 2012
DNS Blacklist Editor
Some DNS blacklist databases separate the type of blacklisting by using a code number in the dns record of the listed IP address e.g. an email spam sender IP might get a DNSBL response of 127.0.0.3, a spam relay IP could show as 127.0.0.4 but a trojan hosting website IP come back with 127.0.0.5. Those different 127.0.0.* IP addresses can be used for filtering email or other traffic by e.g. using the "3" and "4" for an inbound email stream but the "5" for outbound HTTP traffic i.e. preventing users getting to the trojan host. However it looks like APEWS dataset returns just one reply to queries "L2.APEWS.ORG TTL=(35) A=[127.0.0.2]".
Looking through the listings and reviewing the comments that used to be written in the earlier records, we can see some groups of "Cases" that may be useful to some people if C number can be obtained. It should even be possible to extract the relevant data to build smaller datasets specific to a need. The groups of Cases and their text descriptors etc will be published shortly.
April 4, 2012
L2.APEWS.ORG False Positive #15
Wed 2012-04-03 07:50:58: [448:627] Accepting SMTP connection from [24.38.56.81]
Wed 2012-04-03 07:50:58: [448:627] Looking up PTR record for 24.38.56.81 (81.56.38.24.IN-ADDR.ARPA)
Wed 2012-04-03 07:50:59: [448:627] D=81.56.38.24.IN-ADDR.ARPA TTL=(1439) PTR=[mailb.info.humanevents.com]
Wed 2012-04-03 07:50:59: [448:627] Gathering A-records for PTR hosts
Wed 2012-04-03 07:50:59: [448:627] D=mailb.info.humanevents.com TTL=(1440) A=[24.38.56.81]
Wed 2012-04-03 07:50:59: [448:627] --> 220 xxx.xxx.xxx ESMTP MDaemon 6.7.9; Wed, 04 Apr 2012 08:50:59 -0500
Wed 2012-04-03 07:50:59: [448:627] <-- EHLO mailb.info.humanevents.com
Wed 2012-04-03 07:50:59: [448:627] Performing reverse lookup on mailb.info.humanevents.com (looking for 24.38.56.81)
Wed 2012-04-03 07:50:59: [448:627] D=mailb.info.humanevents.com TTL=(1440) A=[24.38.56.81]
Wed 2012-04-03 07:50:59: [448:627] --> 250-xxx.xxx.xxx Hello mailb.info.humanevents.com, pleased to meet you
Wed 2012-04-03 07:50:59: [448:627] --> 250-ETRN
Wed 2012-04-03 07:50:59: [448:627] --> 250-AUTH=LOGIN
Wed 2012-04-03 07:50:59: [448:627] --> 250-AUTH LOGIN CRAM-MD5
Wed 2012-04-03 07:50:59: [448:627] --> 250-8BITMIME
Wed 2012-04-03 07:50:59: [448:627] --> 250 SIZE 0
Wed 2012-04-03 07:50:59: [448:627] <-- MAIL FROM:
Wed 2012-04-03 07:50:59: [448:627] Performing reverse lookup on info.humanevents.com (looking for 24.38.56.81)
Wed 2012-04-03 07:50:59: [448:627] D=info.humanevents.com TTL=(1440) A=[74.201.50.22]
Wed 2012-04-03 07:51:00: [448:627] P=030 D=info.humanevents.com TTL=(1439) MX=[mx2.info.humanevents.com] {74.201.50.6}
Wed 2012-04-03 07:51:00: [448:627] P=010 D=info.humanevents.com TTL=(1439) MX=[mx1.info.humanevents.com] {74.201.50.4}
Wed 2012-04-03 07:51:00: [448:627] Spam Blocker A-record resolution of [81.56.38.24.L2.APEWS.ORG] in progress (DNS Server: 192.168.1.2)...
Wed 2012-04-03 07:51:00: [448:627] Spam Blocker D=81.56.38.24.L2.APEWS.ORG TTL=(35) A=[127.0.0.2]
Wed 2012-04-03 07:51:00: [448:627] L2.APEWS.ORG LISTED
Wed 2012-04-03 07:51:00: [448:627] Message will be accepted and X-RBL-Warning: header will be inserted.
Wed 2012-04-03 07:51:00: [448:627] --> 250
Wed 2012-04-03 07:51:00: [448:627] <-- RCPT TO:
Wed 2012-04-03 07:51:00: [448:627] --> 250
Wed 2012-04-03 07:51:00: [448:627] <-- DATA
Wed 2012-04-03 07:51:00: [448:627] --> 354 Enter mail, end with
Wed 2012-04-03 07:51:01: [448:627] --> 250 Ok, message saved
Wed 2012-04-03 07:51:01: [448:627] <-- QUIT
Wed 2012-04-03 07:51:01: [448:627] --> 221 See ya in cyberspace
Wed 2012-04-03 07:51:01: [448:627] SMTP session successful, 34147 bytes transferred.
Wed 2012-04-03 07:51:01: [448:627] Shuffling message(s) into proper queue(s)
Wed 2012-04-03 07:51:01: [448:627] Message received from mailb.info.humanevents.com [24.38.56.81]
Wed 2012-04-03 07:51:01: ----------
The sending server itself was not listed but the small group listing affected it causing a false positive for us. Resolved already.
April 2, 2012
L2.APEWS.ORG False Positive #14
Sat 2012-03-31 12:30:29: [520:540] Accepting SMTP connection from [178.33.45.10]
Sat 2012-03-31 12:30:29: [520:540] Looking up PTR record for 178.33.45.10 (10.45.33.178.IN-ADDR.ARPA)
Sat 2012-03-31 12:30:30: [520:540] D=10.45.33.178.IN-ADDR.ARPA TTL=(1440) PTR=[18.mo5.mail-out.ovh.net]
Sat 2012-03-31 12:30:30: [520:540] Gathering A-records for PTR hosts
Sat 2012-03-31 12:30:30: [520:540] D=18.mo5.mail-out.ovh.net TTL=(1440) A=[178.33.45.10]
Sat 2012-03-31 12:30:30: [520:540] --> 220 xxx.xxx.xxx ESMTP MDaemon 6.7.9; Sat, 30 Mar 2012 22:30:30 -0500
Sat 2012-03-31 12:30:30: [520:540] <-- EHLO mo5.mail-out.ovh.net
Sat 2012-03-31 12:30:30: [520:540] Performing reverse lookup on mo5.mail-out.ovh.net (looking for 178.33.45.10)
Sat 2012-03-31 12:30:31: [520:540] D=mo5.mail-out.ovh.net TTL=(1440) A=[178.32.228.5]
Sat 2012-03-31 12:30:31: [520:540] --> 250-xxx.xxx.xxx Hello 18.mo5.mail-out.ovh.net (may be forged), pleased to meet you
Sat 2012-03-31 12:30:31: [520:540] --> 250-ETRN
Sat 2012-03-31 12:30:31: [520:540] --> 250-AUTH=LOGIN
Sat 2012-03-31 12:30:31: [520:540] --> 250-AUTH LOGIN CRAM-MD5
Sat 2012-03-31 12:30:31: [520:540] --> 250-8BITMIME
Sat 2012-03-31 12:30:31: [520:540] --> 250 SIZE 0
Sat 2012-03-31 12:30:31: [520:540] <-- MAIL FROM:
Sat 2012-03-31 12:30:31: [520:540] Performing reverse lookup on yyy.yyy (looking for 178.33.45.10)
Sat 2012-03-31 12:30:32: [520:540] D=yyy.yyy TTL=(1439) A=[213.186.33.5]
Sat 2012-03-31 12:30:32: [520:540] P=100 D=webster.fr TTL=(1440) MX=[mxb.ovh.net]
Sat 2012-03-31 12:30:32: [520:540] P=001 D=webster.fr TTL=(1440) MX=[mx0.ovh.net] {213.186.33.32}
Sat 2012-03-31 12:30:33: [520:540] D=mxb.ovh.net TTL=(1440) A=[213.186.39.173]
Sat 2012-03-31 12:30:33: [520:540] Spam Blocker A-record resolution of [10.45.33.178.L2.APEWS.ORG] in progress (DNS Server: 192.168.1.2)...
Sat 2012-03-31 12:30:33: [520:540] Spam Blocker D=10.45.33.178.L2.APEWS.ORG TTL=(35) A=[127.0.0.2]
Sat 2012-03-31 12:30:33: [520:540] L2.APEWS.ORG LISTED
Sat 2012-03-31 12:30:33: [520:540] Message will be accepted and X-RBL-Warning: header will be inserted.
Sat 2012-03-31 12:30:33: [520:540] --> 250
Sat 2012-03-31 12:30:33: [520:540] <-- RCPT TO:
Sat 2012-03-31 12:30:33: [520:540] --> 250
Sat 2012-03-31 12:30:33: [520:540] <-- DATA
Sat 2012-03-31 12:30:33: [520:540] --> 354 Enter mail, end with
Sat 2012-03-31 12:30:33: [520:540] --> 250 Ok, message saved
Sat 2012-03-31 12:30:34: [520:540] <-- QUIT
Sat 2012-03-31 12:30:34: [520:540] --> 221 See ya in cyberspace
Sat 2012-03-31 12:30:34: [520:540] SMTP session successful, 7307 bytes transferred.
Sat 2012-03-31 12:30:34: [520:540] Shuffling message(s) into proper queue(s)
Sat 2012-03-31 12:30:34: [520:540] Message received from mo5.mail-out.ovh.net [178.33.45.10]
OVH often have mail servers in the top 100 spam sources so no surprise that it was listed.
March 18, 2012
L2.APEWS.ORG False Positive #13
Sat 2012-03-17 03:26:37: [7708:766] Accepting SMTP connection from [71.19.224.98]
Sat 2012-03-17 03:26:37: [7708:766] Looking up PTR record for 71.19.224.98 (98.224.19.71.IN-ADDR.ARPA)
Sat 2012-03-17 03:26:37: [7708:766] D=98.224.19.71.IN-ADDR.ARPA TTL=(59) PTR=[www3.tiltedpixel.com]
Sat 2012-03-17 03:26:37: [7708:766] Gathering A-records for PTR hosts
Sat 2012-03-17 03:26:38: [7708:766] D=www3.tiltedpixel.com TTL=(240) A=[71.19.224.98]
Sat 2012-03-17 03:26:38: [7708:766] --> 220 xxx.xxx.xxx ESMTP MDaemon 6.7.9; Sat, 16 Mar 2012 13:06:38 -0500
Sat 2012-03-17 03:26:38: [7708:766] <-- EHLO www3.tiltedpixel.com
Sat 2012-03-17 03:26:38: [7708:766] Performing reverse lookup on www3.tiltedpixel.com (looking for 71.19.224.98)
Sat 2012-03-17 03:26:38: [7708:766] D=www3.tiltedpixel.com TTL=(240) A=[71.19.224.98]
Sat 2012-03-17 03:26:38: [7708:766] --> 250-xxx.xxx.xxx Hello www3.tiltedpixel.com, pleased to meet you
Sat 2012-03-17 03:26:38: [7708:766] --> 250-ETRN
Sat 2012-03-17 03:26:38: [7708:766] --> 250-AUTH=LOGIN
Sat 2012-03-17 03:26:38: [7708:766] --> 250-AUTH LOGIN CRAM-MD5
Sat 2012-03-17 03:26:38: [7708:766] --> 250-8BITMIME
Sat 2012-03-17 03:26:38: [7708:766] --> 250 SIZE 0
Sat 2012-03-17 03:26:38: [7708:766] <-- MAIL FROM:
Sat 2012-03-17 03:26:38: [7708:766] Performing reverse lookup on www3.tiltedpixel.com (looking for 71.19.224.98)
Sat 2012-03-17 03:26:38: [7708:766] D=www3.tiltedpixel.com TTL=(239) A=[71.19.224.98]
Sat 2012-03-17 03:26:38: [7708:766] Spam Blocker A-record resolution of [98.224.19.71.L2.APEWS.ORG] in progress (DNS Server: 192.168.1.2)...
Sat 2012-03-17 03:26:38: [7708:766] Spam Blocker D=98.224.19.71.L2.APEWS.ORG TTL=(35) A=[127.0.0.2]
Sat 2012-03-17 03:26:38: [7708:766] L2.APEWS.ORG LISTED
Sat 2012-03-17 03:26:38: [7708:766] Message will be accepted and X-RBL-Warning: header will be inserted.
Sat 2012-03-17 03:26:38: [7708:766] --> 250
Sat 2012-03-17 03:26:38: [7708:766] <-- RCPT TO:
Sat 2012-03-17 03:26:38: [7708:766] --> 250
Sat 2012-03-17 03:26:38: [7708:766] <-- DATA
Sat 2012-03-17 03:26:38: [7708:766] --> 354 Enter mail, end with
Sat 2012-03-17 03:26:38: [7708:766] --> 250 Ok, message saved
Sat 2012-03-17 03:26:38: [7708:766] <-- QUIT
Sat 2012-03-17 03:26:38: [7708:766] --> 221 See ya in cyberspace
Sat 2012-03-17 03:26:38: [7708:766] SMTP session successful, 959 bytes transferred.
Sat 2012-03-17 03:26:38: [7708:766] Shuffling message(s) into proper queue(s)
Sat 2012-03-17 03:26:38: [7708:766] Message received from www3.tiltedpixel.com [71.19.224.98]
Hopefully this one will get resolved shortly too.
March 16, 2012
Over 1 month without any FP
The SPEWS listing model was to use whole CIDR blocks in order to pressure the ISP. It involved listing the entire block without regard for individual IP addresses and therefore there was collateral damage which was not favored by many. In order for that method to work it requires that users tolerate the collateral damage until such time as the ISP cleaned up the CIDR. That method was flawed because users, network Administrators etc, would rather tolerate spam than collateral damage.
After analysing the APEWS.org data over a period of time we can see that they are no longer following the same model as SPEWS. A few years ago when they first became a replacement for SPEWS, it could have been said that their method was very close if not the same. However, the fact that false positives have reduced dramatically and having probed the listed CIDR, APEWS.org seem to be cutting holes in CIDR for trusted senders and accordingly reducing collateral damage leaving a binary reputation index.
February 10, 2012
L2.APEWS.ORG False Positive #12
Thur 2012-02-09 16:47:29: [60:170] Accepting SMTP connection from [98.158.230.106]
Thur 2012-02-09 16:47:29: [60:170] Looking up PTR record for 98.158.230.106 (106.230.158.98.IN-ADDR.ARPA)
Thur 2012-02-09 16:47:30: [60:170] D=106.230.158.98.IN-ADDR.ARPA TTL=(59) PTR=[business-travelupdate.com]
Thur 2012-02-09 16:47:30: [60:170] Gathering A-records for PTR hosts
Thur 2012-02-09 16:47:30: [60:170] D=business-travelupdate.com TTL=(1440) A=[98.158.230.106]
Thur 2012-02-09 16:47:30: [60:170] --> 220 xxx.xxx.xxx ESMTP MDaemon 6.7.9; Thur, 09 Feb 2012 16:47:30 -0500
Thur 2012-02-09 16:47:30: [60:170] <-- EHLO business-travelupdate.com
Thur 2012-02-09 16:47:30: [60:170] Performing reverse lookup on business-travelupdate.com (looking for 98.158.230.106)
Thur 2012-02-09 16:47:30: [60:170] D=business-travelupdate.com TTL=(1440) A=[98.158.230.106]
Thur 2012-02-09 16:47:30: [60:170] --> 250-xxx.xxx.xxx Hello business-travelupdate.com, pleased to meet you
Thur 2012-02-09 16:47:30: [60:170] --> 250-ETRN
Thur 2012-02-09 16:47:30: [60:170] --> 250-AUTH=LOGIN
Thur 2012-02-09 16:47:30: [60:170] --> 250-AUTH LOGIN CRAM-MD5
Thur 2012-02-09 16:47:30: [60:170] --> 250-8BITMIME
Thur 2012-02-09 16:47:30: [60:170] --> 250 SIZE 0
Thur 2012-02-09 16:47:31: [60:170] <-- MAIL FROM:
Thur 2012-02-09 16:47:31: [60:170] Performing reverse lookup on business-travelupdate.com (looking for 98.158.230.106)
Thur 2012-02-09 16:47:31: [60:170] D=business-travelupdate.com TTL=(1439) A=[98.158.230.106]
Thur 2012-02-09 16:47:31: [60:170] Spam Blocker A-record resolution of [106.230.158.98.L2.APEWS.ORG] in progress (DNS Server: 192.168.1.2)...
Thur 2012-02-09 16:47:31: [60:170] Spam Blocker D=106.230.158.98.L2.APEWS.ORG TTL=(35) A=[127.0.0.2]
Thur 2012-02-09 16:47:31: [60:170] L2.APEWS.ORG LISTED
Thur 2012-02-09 16:47:31: [60:170] Message will be accepted and X-RBL-Warning: header will be inserted.
Thur 2012-02-09 16:47:31: [60:170] --> 250
Thur 2012-02-09 16:47:31: [60:170] <-- RCPT TO:
Thur 2012-02-09 16:47:31: [60:170] --> 250
Thur 2012-02-09 16:47:31: [60:170] <-- DATA
Thur 2012-02-09 16:47:31: [60:170] --> 354 Enter mail, end with
Thur 2012-02-09 16:47:31: [60:170] --> 250 Ok, message saved
Thur 2012-02-09 16:47:31: [60:170] <-- QUIT
Thur 2012-02-09 16:47:31: [60:170] --> 221 See ya in cyberspace
Thur 2012-02-09 16:47:31: [60:170] SMTP session successful, 1453 bytes transferred.
Thur 2012-02-09 16:47:31: [60:170] Shuffling message(s) into proper queue(s)
Thur 2012-02-09 16:47:31: [60:170] Message received from business-travelupdate.com [98.158.230.106]
You may see fluctuations in your statistics which could be due to the rotation between IP addresses that some newsletter senders do. Where one IP address is listed and another is not, the newsletter will alternate between the spam folder and the inbox unless you have the IP address in your whitelist and/or a filter to move mis-placed emails.
January 28, 2012
L2.APEWS.ORG False Positive #11
Fri 2012-01-27 16:33:25: [6810:112] Accepting SMTP connection from [205.201.136.59]
Fri 2012-01-27 16:33:25: [6810:112] Looking up PTR record for 205.201.136.59 (59.136.201.205.IN-ADDR.ARPA)
Fri 2012-01-27 16:33:25: [6810:112] D=59.136.201.205.in-addr.arpa TTL=(1440) PTR=[mail59.us4.mandrillapp.com]
Fri 2012-01-27 16:33:25: [6810:112] Gathering A-records for PTR hosts
Fri 2012-01-27 16:33:25: [6810:112] D=mail59.us4.mandrillapp.com TTL=(1440) A=[205.201.136.59]
Fri 2012-01-27 16:33:25: [6810:112] --> 220 xxx.xxx.xxx ESMTP MDaemon 6.7.9; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 16:33:25 -0500
Fri 2012-01-27 16:33:25: [6810:112] <-- EHLO mail59.us4.mandrillapp.com
Fri 2012-01-27 16:33:25: [6810:112] Performing reverse lookup on mail59.us4.mandrillapp.com (looking for 205.201.136.59)
Fri 2012-01-27 16:33:26: [6810:112] D=mail59.us4.mandrillapp.com TTL=(1440) A=[205.201.136.59]
Fri 2012-01-27 16:33:26: [6810:112] --> 250-xxx.xxx.xxx Hello mail59.us4.mandrillapp.com, pleased to meet you
Fri 2012-01-27 16:33:26: [6810:112] --> 250-ETRN
Fri 2012-01-27 16:33:26: [6810:112] --> 250-AUTH=LOGIN
Fri 2012-01-27 16:33:26: [6810:112] --> 250-AUTH LOGIN CRAM-MD5
Fri 2012-01-27 16:33:26: [6810:112] --> 250-8BITMIME
Fri 2012-01-27 16:33:26: [6810:112] --> 250 SIZE 0
Fri 2012-01-27 16:33:26: [6810:112] <-- MAIL FROM:
Fri 2012-01-27 16:33:26: [6810:112] Performing reverse lookup on mail59.us4.mandrillapp.com (looking for 205.201.136.59)
Fri 2012-01-27 16:33:26: [6810:112] D=mail59.us4.mandrillapp.com TTL=(1439) A=[205.201.136.59]
Fri 2012-01-27 16:33:26: [6810:112] Spam Blocker A-record resolution of [59.136.201.205.L2.APEWS.ORG] in progress (DNS Server: 192.168.1.2)...
Fri 2012-01-27 16:33:26: [6810:112] Spam Blocker D=59.136.201.205.L2.APEWS.ORG TTL=(35) A=[127.0.0.2]
Fri 2012-01-27 16:33:26: [6810:112] L2.APEWS.ORG LISTED
Fri 2012-01-27 16:33:26: [6810:112] Message will be accepted and X-RBL-Warning: header will be inserted.
Fri 2012-01-27 16:33:26: [6810:112] --> 250
Fri 2012-01-27 16:33:26: [6810:112] <-- RCPT TO:
Fri 2012-01-27 16:33:26: [6810:112] --> 250
Fri 2012-01-27 16:33:26: [6810:112] <-- DATA
Fri 2012-01-27 16:33:26: [6810:112] --> 354 Enter mail, end with
Fri 2012-01-27 16:33:27: [6810:112] --> 250 Ok, message saved
Fri 2012-01-27 16:33:27: [6810:112] <-- QUIT
Fri 2012-01-27 16:33:27: [6810:112] --> 221 See ya in cyberspace
Fri 2012-01-27 16:33:27: [6810:112] SMTP session successful, 30303 bytes transferred.
Fri 2012-01-27 16:33:27: [6810:112] Shuffling message(s) into proper queue(s)
Fri 2012-01-27 16:33:27: [6810:112] Message received from mail59.us4.mandrillapp.com [205.201.136.59]
We will check this and report back in due course.
December 25, 2011
L2.APEWS.ORG False Positive #10
Sat 2011-12-24 06:53:43: [916:2344] Accepting SMTP connection from [83.223.106.9]
Sat 2011-12-24 06:53:43: [916:2344] Looking up PTR record for 83.223.106.9 (9.106.223.83.IN-ADDR.ARPA)
Sat 2011-12-24 06:53:44: [916:2344] D=9.106.223.83.IN-ADDR.ARPA TTL=(1440) PTR=[fusion.bpweb.net]
Sat 2011-12-24 06:53:44: [916:2344] Gathering A-records for PTR hosts
Sat 2011-12-24 06:53:44: [916:2344] D=fusion.bpweb.net TTL=(120) A=[83.223.106.9]
Sat 2011-12-24 06:53:44: [916:2344] --> 220 xxx.xxx.xxx ESMTP MDaemon 6.7.9; Sun, 25 Dec 2011 06:53:44 -0500
Sat 2011-12-24 06:53:44: [916:2344] <-- EHLO fusion.bpweb.net
Sat 2011-12-24 06:53:44: [916:2344] Performing reverse lookup on fusion.bpweb.net (looking for 83.223.106.9)
Sat 2011-12-24 06:53:44: [916:2344] D=fusion.bpweb.net TTL=(120) A=[83.223.106.9]
Sat 2011-12-24 06:53:44: [916:2344] --> 250-xxx.xxx.xxx Hello fusion.bpweb.net, pleased to meet you
Sat 2011-12-24 06:53:44: [916:2344] --> 250-ETRN
Sat 2011-12-24 06:53:44: [916:2344] --> 250-AUTH=LOGIN
Sat 2011-12-24 06:53:44: [916:2344] --> 250-AUTH LOGIN CRAM-MD5
Sat 2011-12-24 06:53:44: [916:2344] --> 250-8BITMIME
Sat 2011-12-24 06:53:44: [916:2344] --> 250 SIZE 0
Sat 2011-12-24 06:53:45: [916:2344] <-- MAIL From:
Sat 2011-12-24 06:53:45: [916:2344] Performing reverse lookup on londonmagicstore.co.uk (looking for 83.223.106.9)
Sat 2011-12-24 06:53:45: [916:2344] D=londonmagicstore.co.uk TTL=(119) A=[87.117.239.236]
Sat 2011-12-24 06:53:46: [916:2344] P=050 D=londonmagicstore.co.uk TTL=(120) MX=[aspmx3.googlemail.com] {74.125.127.27}
Sat 2011-12-24 06:53:46: [916:2344] P=040 D=londonmagicstore.co.uk TTL=(120) MX=[aspmx2.googlemail.com] {74.125.43.27}
Sat 2011-12-24 06:53:46: [916:2344] P=030 D=londonmagicstore.co.uk TTL=(120) MX=[alt2.aspmx.l.google.com]
Sat 2011-12-24 06:53:46: [916:2344] P=020 D=londonmagicstore.co.uk TTL=(120) MX=[alt1.aspmx.l.google.com]
Sat 2011-12-24 06:53:46: [916:2344] P=010 D=londonmagicstore.co.uk TTL=(120) MX=[aspmx.l.google.com]
Sat 2011-12-24 06:53:46: [916:2344] D=alt2.aspmx.l.google.com TTL=(4) A=[74.125.65.26]
Sat 2011-12-24 06:53:46: [916:2344] D=alt1.aspmx.l.google.com TTL=(4) A=[209.85.225.26]
Sat 2011-12-24 06:53:46: [916:2344] D=aspmx.l.google.com TTL=(4) A=[74.125.127.26]
Sat 2011-12-24 06:53:46: [916:2344] Spam Blocker A-record resolution of [9.106.223.83.L2.APEWS.ORG] in progress (DNS Server: 192.168.1.2)...
Sat 2011-12-24 06:53:46: [916:2344] Spam Blocker D=9.106.223.83.L2.APEWS.ORG TTL=(35) A=[127.0.0.2]
Sat 2011-12-24 06:53:46: [916:2344] L2.APEWS.ORG LISTED
Sat 2011-12-24 06:53:46: [916:2344] Message will be accepted and X-RBL-Warning: header will be inserted.
Sat 2011-12-24 06:53:46: [916:2344] --> 250
Sat 2011-12-24 06:53:46: [916:2344] <-- RCPT To:
Sat 2011-12-24 06:53:46: [916:2344] --> 250
Sat 2011-12-24 06:53:47: [916:2344] <-- DATA
Sat 2011-12-24 06:53:47: [916:2344] --> 354 Enter mail, end with
Sat 2011-12-24 06:53:49: [916:2344] --> 250 Ok, message saved
Sat 2011-12-24 06:53:49: [916:2344] <-- QUIT
Sat 2011-12-24 06:53:49: [916:2344] --> 221 See ya in cyberspace
Sat 2011-12-24 06:53:49: [916:2344] SMTP session successful, 113812 bytes transferred.
Sat 2011-12-24 06:53:49: [916:2344] Shuffling message(s) into proper queue(s)
Sat 2011-12-24 06:53:49: [916:2344] Message received from fusion.bpweb.net [83.223.106.9]
As before, we will report back if this gets de-listed.
December 24, 2011
Comparison of some DNSBL results
DNSBL | % | Errors |
| l2.apews.org | 95 | 0.5% |
| b.barracudacentral.org | 94 | |
| * uceprotect.net 1,2 & 3 | 91 | <0.2% |
| zen.spamhaus.org | 91 | <0.1% |
| ip.v4bl.org | 68 | |
| cbl.abuseat.org | 68 | <0.1% |
| spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net | 65 | |
| dnsbl-2.uceprotect.net | 63 | <0.1% |
| dnsbl-3.uceprotect.net | 63 | <0.2% |
| hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com | 62 | |
| bl.tiopan.com | 61 | |
| dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net | 51 | <0.1% |
| bl.mailspike.net | 45 | |
| ix.dnsbl.manitu.net | 44 | 1.5 |
| truncate.gbudb.net | 43 | |
| bl.spameatingmonkey.net | 38 | |
| blackholes.five-ten-sg.com | 37 | |
| bl.spamcop.net | 31 | <0.1% |
| psbl.surriel.com | 18 | <0.1% |
| db.upbl.info | 14 | <0.1% |
| dnsbl.imps.de | 8 | |
| no-more-funn.moensted.dk | 7 | <0.1% |
| bl.spamcannibal.org | 3 | |
| spam.spamrats.com | 2 | <0.1% |
| * does not exist as a single dnsbl, use 3 lists | ||
That accords with our findings too, very respectable error rates before the use of a whitelist. Only Barracuda's system comes close and they require a free registration before you can access their data. You can use a combined result from all 3 lists at UCEProtect.net to achieve similar results though they do have lower error rates.
There are websites that offer a one-stop lookup service, like dnsbl.info, where you can input an IP address and see which blacklists have it listed. In their case, dnsbl.info test 80+ blacklists but do not include l2.apews.org which seems odd when you see the results above. Yet they show the results from other blacklists with more than double the error rate, odd that.
December 19, 2011
Antihosts.exe trojan
191.164.12.1 zuleica
191.162.91.2 tarantula
19.251.32.13 ariranha
112.158.12.22 leandrino
132.168.7.42 zecurlano
121.91.41.151 cotidiano
121.15.12.137 www.banespa.com.br # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 banespa.com.br # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 www.santander.com.br # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 santander.com.br # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 caixa.com.br # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 www.cef.gov.br # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 cef.gov.br # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 www.cef.com.br # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 www.caixa.gov.br # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 caixa.gov.br # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 www.caixa.com.br # GbPluguin
209.94.172.28 live.com # GbPluguin
209.94.172.28 www.live.com # GbPluguin
209.94.172.28 www.msn.com # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 cef.com.br # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 internetbanking.caixa.gov.br # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 internetbanking.caixa.com.br # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 internetbanking.cef.gov.br # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 internetbanking.cef.com.br # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 www.e-gold.com.br # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 e-gold.com.br # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 www.e-gold.com # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 e-gold.com # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 www.bradescoprime.com.br # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 www.cetelem.com.br # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 cetelem.com.br # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 www.cartaoaura.com.br # GbPluguin
209.94.172.28 msn.com # GbPluguin
209.94.172.28 www.msn.com.br # GbPluguin
209.94.172.28 login.live.com # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 cartaoaura.com.br # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 bradescoprime.com.br # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 www.itaupersonnalite.com.br # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 itaupersonnalite.com.br # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 americanexpress.com.br # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 www.sicredi.com.br # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 sicredi.com.br # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 portal.sicredi.com.br # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 www.realsecureweb.com.br # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 realsecureweb.com.br # GbPluguin
209.94.172.28 www.hotmail.com # GbPluguin
209.94.172.28 hotmail.com # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 www.americanexpress.com.br # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 www.americanexpress.com # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 www.real.com.br # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 www.bancoreal.com.br # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 real.com.br # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 bancoreal.com.br # GbPluguin
209.94.172.28 www.hotmail.com.br # GbPluguin
209.94.172.28 hotmail.com.br # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 itau.com.br # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 www.itau.com # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 itau.com # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 imagem.caixa.gov.br # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 imagem.caixa.com.br # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 imagem.cef.gov.br # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 imagem.cef.com.br # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 www.bradesco.com.br # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 bradesco.com.br # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 www.bradesco.com # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 bradesco.com # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 www.itau.com.br # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 www.realsecureweb.com.br # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 santanderempresarial.com.br # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 www.santanderempresarial.com.br # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 santanderempresarial.com # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 www.santanderempresarial.com # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 www.citibank.com.br # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 citibank.com.br # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 www.citibank.com # GbPluguin
121.15.12.137 citibank.com # GbPluguin
32.19.12.1 ezekien.lorena
22.93.11.98 marcos.gladiador
11.12.44.1 zumbi.palmares
81.55.12.4 arthur.erculando
Interesting that some USA Department Of Defense IP addresses are referred to as is a Ford Motor Company one too. The others are in South Korea, France, Australia and China. The trojan is capturing user names and passwords for the above mentioned banks etc.
The infection arrived in a spam email from a known-to-the-user Hotmail email address, probably a compromised account, with a link to a video about pedofilia. Clicking the link caused the trojan to install and make various changes including the above hosts file replacement.
Spammers ignore 550 command
Sat 2011-12-17 05:43:06: [468:256] Accepting SMTP connection from [67.159.33.100]
Sat 2011-12-17 05:43:06: [468:256] Looking up PTR record for 67.159.33.100 (100.33.159.67.IN-ADDR.ARPA)
Sat 2011-12-17 05:43:21: [468:256] The name server reports that it is having technical problems.
Sat 2011-12-17 05:43:21: [468:256] --> 220 xxx1.xxx.xxx ESMTP MDaemon 6.7.9; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 04:43:21 -0500
Sat 2011-12-17 05:43:21: [468:256] <-- EHLO super.jbcapacitacionempresarial.com
Sat 2011-12-17 05:43:21: [468:256] Performing reverse lookup on super.jbcapacitacionempresarial.com (looking for 67.159.33.100)
Sat 2011-12-17 05:43:22: [468:256] D=super.jbcapacitacionempresarial.com TTL=(240) A=[67.159.33.100]
Sat 2011-12-17 05:43:22: [468:256] --> 250-xxx1.xxx.xxx Hello super.jbcapacitacionempresarial.com, pleased to meet you
Sat 2011-12-17 05:43:22: [468:256] --> 250-ETRN
Sat 2011-12-17 05:43:22: [468:256] --> 250-AUTH=LOGIN
Sat 2011-12-17 05:43:22: [468:256] --> 250-AUTH LOGIN CRAM-MD5
Sat 2011-12-17 05:43:22: [468:256] --> 250-8BITMIME
Sat 2011-12-17 05:43:22: [468:256] --> 250 SIZE 0
Sat 2011-12-17 05:43:22: [468:256] <-- MAIL FROM:
Sat 2011-12-17 05:43:22: [468:256] Performing reverse lookup on jbcapacitacionempresarial.com (looking for 67.159.33.100)
Sat 2011-12-17 05:43:22: [468:256] D=jbcapacitacionempresarial.com TTL=(240) A=[67.159.33.101]
Sat 2011-12-17 05:43:22: [468:256] P=010 D=jbcapacitacionempresarial.com TTL=(240) MX=[mail.jbcapacitacionempresarial.com] {67.159.33.101}
Sat 2011-12-17 05:43:22: [468:256] Spam Blocker A-record resolution of [100.33.159.67.L2.APEWS.ORG] in progress (DNS Server: 192.168.1.3)...
Sat 2011-12-17 05:43:22: [468:256] Spam Blocker D=100.33.159.67.L2.APEWS.ORG TTL=(35) A=[127.0.0.2]
Sat 2011-12-17 05:43:22: [468:256] L2.APEWS.ORG LISTED
Sat 2011-12-17 05:43:22: [468:256] --> 250
Sat 2011-12-17 05:43:22: [468:256] <-- RCPT TO:
Sat 2011-12-17 05:43:22: [468:256] 'Recipient unknown' given to divert future spam
Sat 2011-12-17 05:43:22: [468:256] --> 550
Sat 2011-12-17 05:43:23: [468:256] <-- QUIT
Sat 2011-12-17 05:43:23: [468:256] --> 221 See ya in cyberspace
Sat 2011-12-17 05:43:23: [468:256] SMTP session successful, 154 bytes transferred.
December 13, 2011
L2.APEWS.ORG False Positive #9
Sat 2011-12-10 15:07:33: [968:7309] Accepting SMTP connection from [184.106.86.136]
Sat 2011-12-10 15:07:33: [968:7309] Looking up PTR record for 184.106.86.136 (136.86.106.184.IN-ADDR.ARPA)
Sat 2011-12-10 15:07:33: [968:7309] D=136.86.106.184.IN-ADDR.ARPA TTL=(5) PTR=[mr136.createsend.com]
Sat 2011-12-10 15:07:33: [968:7309] Gathering A-records for PTR hosts
Sat 2011-12-10 15:07:33: [968:7309] D=mr136.createsend.com TTL=(120) A=[184.106.86.136]
Sat 2011-12-10 15:07:33: [968:7309] --> 220 xxx.xxx.xxx ESMTP MDaemon 6.7.9; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 15:07:33 -0500
Sat 2011-12-10 15:07:33: [968:7309] <-- EHLO mr136.createsend.com
Sat 2011-12-10 15:07:33: [968:7309] Performing reverse lookup on mr136.createsend.com (looking for 184.106.86.136)
Sat 2011-12-10 15:07:33: [968:7309] D=mr136.createsend.com TTL=(119) A=[184.106.86.136]
Sat 2011-12-10 15:07:33: [968:7309] --> 250-xxx.xxx.xxx Hello mr136.createsend.com, pleased to meet you
Sat 2011-12-10 15:07:33: [968:7309] --> 250-ETRN
Sat 2011-12-10 15:07:33: [968:7309] --> 250-AUTH=LOGIN
Sat 2011-12-10 15:07:33: [968:7309] --> 250-AUTH LOGIN CRAM-MD5
Sat 2011-12-10 15:07:33: [968:7309] --> 250-8BITMIME
Sat 2011-12-10 15:07:33: [968:7309] --> 250 SIZE 0
Sat 2011-12-10 15:07:33: [968:7309] <-- MAIL FROM:
Sat 2011-12-10 15:07:33: [968:7309] Performing reverse lookup on createsend3.com (looking for 184.106.86.136)
Sat 2011-12-10 15:07:33: [968:7309] D=createsend3.com TTL=(720) A=[27.126.145.32]
Sat 2011-12-10 15:07:33: [968:7309] P=010 D=createsend3.com TTL=(240) MX=[mx1.createsend3.com] {27.126.144.2}
Sat 2011-12-10 15:07:33: [968:7309] Spam Blocker A-record resolution of [136.86.106.184.l2.apews.org] in progress (DNS Server: 192.168.1.2)...
Sat 2011-12-10 15:07:33: [968:7309] Spam Blocker D=136.86.106.184.l2.apews.org TTL=(35) A=[127.0.0.2]
Sat 2011-12-10 15:07:33: [968:7309] APEWS listed, 99.7% certain it is spam
Sat 2011-12-10 15:07:33: [968:7309] Message will be accepted and X-RBL-Warning: header will be inserted.
Sat 2011-12-10 15:07:33: [968:7309] --> 250
Sat 2011-12-10 15:07:33: [968:7309] <-- RCPT TO:
Sat 2011-12-10 15:07:33: [968:7309] --> 250
Sat 2011-12-10 15:07:33: [968:7309] <-- DATA
Sat 2011-12-10 15:07:33: [968:7309] --> 354 Enter mail, end with
Sat 2011-12-10 15:07:33: [968:7309] --> 250 Ok, message saved
Sat 2011-12-10 15:07:33: [968:7309] <-- QUIT
Sat 2011-12-10 15:07:33: [968:7309] --> 221 See ya in cyberspace
Sat 2011-12-10 15:07:33: [968:7309] SMTP session successful, 26599 bytes transferred.
Sat 2011-12-10 15:07:33: [968:7309] Shuffling message(s) into proper queue(s)
Sat 2011-12-10 15:07:33: [968:7309] Message received from mr136.createsend.com [184.106.86.136]
December 10, 2011
Whois utility SamSpade
http://majorgeeks.com/Sam_Spade_d594.html
At just over a Mb it certainly isn't bloated with anything! Once installed it can be opened to reveal a simpe gray window. Put the unknown IP address in the top left box, for this example we will use the spammer just referred to, at 67.159.33.100;
The main registers for IP address ranges are;
ARIN, North American continent
RIPE, European continent and Middle East
LACNIC, Central and South America
APNIC, Asia, Pacific, Far East and Oceana
AFRINIC, Africa
Top center of SamSpade you will see a choice box, select whois.arin.net and then look to the left, down a little you will see an icon for "whois". Click on that and you get the following in your SamSpade window;
NetRange: 67.159.0.0 - 67.159.63.255
CIDR: 67.159.0.0/18
OriginAS:
NetName: FDCSERVERS
NetHandle: NET-67-159-0-0-1
Parent: NET-67-0-0-0-0
NetType: Direct Allocation
RegDate: 2004-10-12
Updated: 2006-12-27
OrgName: FDCservers.net
OrgId: FDCSE
Address: 141 w jackson blvd.
Address: suite #1135
City: Chicago
StateProv: IL
PostalCode: 60604
Country: US
RegDate: 2003-05-20
Updated: 2011-03-28
In our experience FDCServers do not have a good reputation and quite often have their IP addresses listed in the top 100 spam senders at any one time. Probably not too caring about the spam problem.
Another test that you can perform is from the top toolbar, the button called "Basics". Click on that and second one down on the list is NSLOOKUP, a test for finding the DNS name recorded for the IP address or domain name. For 67.159.33.100 we get the following result;
"nslookup 67.159.33.100
No reverse DNS (WSANO_DATA)"
Very impressive, there isn't one. FDCServers have an IP address pumping out emails with no reverse DNS set. The spammer therefore can set the HELO/EHLO server name to what ever he likes and change it whenever he likes. FDC should write the server name in their DNS and setup the PTR record so that it accords with the A record, therefore permitting real-time reverse DNS (rDNS) tests to succeed. You will note that our email server timed out trying to get that IP address DNS record. Failing to do so is open to abuse as we have seen, yet it is so easy to do, it literally takes 5 minutes to edit the DNS and only needs doing once.
Email servers can send emails for and on behalf of numerous domain names and this does not affect the name of the server in DNS, it's reverse DNS record or the HELO/EHLO used.
To get another opinion about IP addresses, networks, network providerss and server hosting businesses, try the following;
http://www.senderbase.org/
Over on the right of the home page you will see a box for "reputation lookup", insert 67.159.33.100 and click the button underneath. The window shows results for the IP address and associated email senders of the same domain name and IP addresses (in this case 67.159.33.0/24). Note the results;
67.159.33.33 is shown as "neutral" written in black text
67.159.33.100 is shown as "neutral" written in black text
67.159.33.101 is shown as "good" written in green text but
67.159.33.100 is shown as "poor" written in red text
Now change the address block to be /18 as the Whois tells us, FDCServers have an IP address block of that size, click "Go";
At the time of writing there are nearly 400 detected email senders from that /18 IP block and there is a lot of red! This second opinion of FDC agrees with our own experience.
Top center of the SenderBase.org web page is a button called "Top Senders", choose "Top Spam Senders" to see a recent report and the same old names.
L2.APEWS.ORG for blocking works great
We have been showing all the false positives that we receive on some commercial email servers that receive global email flows. The average FP rate is going to be about one, yes one, email per week! None of them were critical, more inconvenient than anything and in a couple of cases, they were possible FP only that were actually correct in identifying spam.
Are email server Administrators so lazy or incapable that they can't sort out one email a week for a user? And why can't they run a whitelist, I mean, no sane email Administrator would run an email server without one, right?
Here is evidence of a spammer having delivery denied, and you are going to ask how do I know it was spam if delivery was denied? Well, we have setup secondary and tertiary MX servers operating the exact same configuration as the primary servers but with blocking in place, not insert an X-Header for listed IP addresses of senders. The spammer delivered a copy of the same spam to an alternate server and was blocked from delivering on another server, so in that way we were able to see and check the spam to confirm.
Sat 2011-12-10 4:29:07: [1234:787] Accepting SMTP connection from [67.159.33.100]
Sat 2011-12-10 4:29:07: [1234:787] Looking up PTR record for 67.159.33.100 (100.33.159.67.IN-ADDR.ARPA)
Sat 2011-12-10 4:29:07: [1234:787] 3 second wait for DNS response exceeded
Sat 2011-12-10 4:29:07: [1234:787] --> 220 xxx.xxx.xxx ESMTP MDaemon 6.7.9; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 4:29:07 -0200
Sat 2011-12-10 4:29:07: [1234:787] <-- EHLO super.jbcapacitacionempresarial.com
Sat 2011-12-10 4:29:07: [1234:787] Performing reverse lookup on super.jbcapacitacionempresarial.com (looking for 67.159.33.100)
Sat 2011-12-10 4:29:07: [1234:787] D=super.jbcapacitacionempresarial.com TTL=(240) A=[67.159.33.100]
Sat 2011-12-10 4:29:07: [1234:787] --> 250-xxx.xxx.xxx Hello super.jbcapacitacionempresarial.com, pleased to meet you
Sat 2011-12-10 4:29:07: [1234:787] --> 250-ETRN
Sat 2011-12-10 4:29:07: [1234:787] --> 250-AUTH=LOGIN
Sat 2011-12-10 4:29:07: [1234:787] --> 250-AUTH LOGIN CRAM-MD5
Sat 2011-12-10 4:29:07: [1234:787] --> 250-8BITMIME
Sat 2011-12-10 4:29:07: [1234:787] --> 250 SIZE 0
Sat 2011-12-10 4:29:07: [1234:787] <-- MAIL FROM:
Sat 2011-12-10 4:29:07: [1234:787] Performing reverse lookup on jbcapacitacionempresarial.com (looking for 67.159.33.100)
Sat 2011-12-10 4:29:07: [1234:787] D=jbcapacitacionempresarial.com TTL=(240) A=[67.159.33.101]
Sat 2011-12-10 4:29:07: [1234:787] P=010 D=jbcapacitacionempresarial.com TTL=(240) MX=[mail.jbcapacitacionempresarial.com] {67.159.33.101}
Sat 2011-12-10 4:29:07: [1234:787] Spam Blocker A-record resolution of [100.33.159.67.l2.apews.org] in progress (DNS Server: 192.168.1.1)...
Sat 2011-12-10 4:29:07: [1234:787] Spam Blocker D=100.33.159.67.l2.apews.org TTL=(35) A=[127.0.0.2]
Sat 2011-12-10 4:29:07: [1234:787] APEWS.ORG listed, 99.7% certain it is spam
Sat 2011-12-10 4:29:07: [1234:787] --> 250
Sat 2011-12-10 4:29:07: [1234:787] <-- RCPT TO:
Sat 2011-12-10 4:29:07: [1234:787] 'Recipient unknown' given to divert future spam
Sat 2011-12-10 4:29:07: [1234:787] --> 550
Sat 2011-12-10 4:29:07: [1234:787] <-- QUIT
Sat 2011-12-10 4:29:07: [1234:787] --> 221 See ya in cyberspace
Sat 2011-12-10 4:29:07: [1234:787] SMTP session successful, 154 bytes transferred.
The spammer was given a "550" user unknown reply and that should get the email address removed from the sender's database however, these days 550 get ignored and spammers keep trying to deliver to all email servers that they can get access to.
Email servers that send solicited emails do so by checking their cache or public DNS to find where to deliver an email. They try the first MX listed and only try the second or third if delivery was not possible and the retry period exhausted depending on the configuration chosen by the email Administrator of that server. Outbound email servers are typically not listed in DNS as MX i.e. senders and so even though they listen on TCP port 25, they should never receive emails.
Even domain delivery receipts and recipient display or read receipts use the same MX servers in the order of priority MX1, MX2, MX3 etc as configured in DNS by the Administrator for each domain name. Spammers ignore that and just send to all and any servers listening on TCP port 25. L2.Apews.org is therefore excellent for use in blocking and denying delivery on such servers if not other MX servers depending on the ability of the email Administrator.
Look again at the false positives that we have listed here, had we been blocking from day 1 then each of these would not have been allowed delivery into the network. See anything mission critical there? With a decent whitelist those FP would have been even fewer or zero. Why pay for a spam solution? Surely anyone making money out of spam solutions is part of the problem, they wouldn't want to give up their income. Needless to say, good email Administrators are worth their weight in gold, better to pay them than pay for anti-spam services or "solutions".